Art Museums and Contradicting Ecologies

Worldviews and Boundary Work

Authors

  • Paul Buckermann Universität Heidelberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11576/ao-6029

Keywords:

cultural organizations, Sociology of art, evaluation, quantification, museum, boundary work, boundary object, cultural politics

Abstract

Navigating a complex social ecology, art museums face multiple and contradicting demands. This article contributes, first, to a deeper understanding of cultural organizations’ practices, and does so by taking their worldviews into consideration. Based on an interview study with museum professionals in Germany and Austria, I reconstruct museum professionals’ understanding of their world to relate specific strategies with professionals’ specific assumptions about art organizational publics like experts, visitors, politicians, sponsors and journalists. Second, I apply concepts from the sociology of the arts, sociology of (scientific) knowledge and organizational studies to grasp the role of organizations and professionals for the autonomy of art. I show how museums function as filters and translators across symbolic boundaries between art and other social domains. Conducting this boundary work, museums produce fine-tuned information and products to meet contradicting demands and, simultaneously, protect art-specific criteria. These findings shed a new light on cultural fields and coping strategies regarding pressures from hostile worlds.

Downloads

Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    397
  • PDF
    415
Further information

Published

2023-03-09

How to Cite

Buckermann, P. (2023). Art Museums and Contradicting Ecologies: Worldviews and Boundary Work. Artis Observatio. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Kunstsoziologie Und Soziologie Der Künste, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.11576/ao-6029

Issue

Section

Article